Tag Archives: mccarrick

Teddy Baby (Tell the Radio Good Night)

With apologies to the late Helen Reddy for, I don’t know, something…

Let’s talk about the title. Earlier today I was perusing a blog I read frequently. If you’ve never checked out Dymphna’s Road, I suggest you give it a gander. In her most recent piece, the author drops a little nugget at the end about the repulsive reprobate faggot Theodore McCarrick.

Let me state this again in case anyone reading this page doesn’t know. From 1996-2001 I was a seminarian of the Archdiocese of Newark where old Teddy was the Archbishop. I have heard the line tossed about before: “Everyone knew!” And I can assure you on my twin sister’s grave that some of us definitely did not know. I was 18 when I entered and 23 when I was given the boot just two days after 9/11 for, as near as I can tell, not being a friend of Dorothy? Oh sure, the stated reason was that I had refused an assignment. You’re damn right I did. I had been sent to serve in a parish with a priest-supervisor of a more-than-shady reputation. I turned in my keys within the hour and walked away. You see, when I clearly recognized a dangerous man I immediately determined to have nothing to do with him. I did not care about my future ecclesiastical career nor about what others thought of me.

And that was because of one low-level priest!

Holy Martyrs of England and Wales Catholic Church (Anglican Ordinariate), Murietta, CA – submitted by a reader.

My friends, believe me, if I had known about the boss, I would have blown the whistle. I don’t front and I never have.

But how, you ask, could you not have known?! Everyone knew!

Again, that statement is true enough but not 100% accurate.

You know who knew? I’ll tell you who.

Fr. Boniface Ramsey knew and he tried to do something but the Nuncio (at the time, I believe it was Archbishop Gabriel Montalvo) did nothing.

And you know who else knew?

Friends of mine, brother seminarians.

They told me after the fact about things that Teddy had done to them.

Creepy things like requesting them specifically to serve as his weekend driver and then, when they pulled up to the residence at 89 Ridge, Teddy would creepily put his hand upon their knee, complimenting their appearance.

What did those friends do?

Nothing. Although, not long after, they “left formation” (dropped out of the seminary), presumably disgusted by what they had witnessed and probably a little unsure that anyone would ever believe them. See, these were the guys who were genuinely shocked and probably a bit embarrassed.

And then of course there were those who, in hindsight, were absolutely gaming the system. They were in bed with him in every sense. They knew and they were never going to spill the beans, let alone to little old me who they knew to be as straight-laced as they come.

But me?

I like to imagine that I was just too innocent. Perhaps naive? I could explain it from a two pronged front.

1). McCarrick knew of my family. In fact he knew everything about everyone if it interested him. He knew that my dad was the real deal. In other words, I had been raised in a stable, two-parent home where my father protected us and my mother stayed home and all that jazz. I had no underlying pysch issues. No divorce, no abuse, no nothin’. And I also didn’t have a questionable immigration status like half of the sems. No, sir. I was born in New Jersey and thank God for that.

2). On the day I entered formation, my mother took me aside. “Son,” she said, “Promise me you’ll pray a Memorare every day for the rest of your life. Blessed Mother will protect you.” I didn’t know what she meant and I’m not sure how she would have known what I was getting into, but I kept my word – even to today. And Blessed Mother kept me safe.

So the crux here is that if Teddy didn’t want you to know, you didn’t know. I’m not complaining. I made it through relatively unscathed.

Ooh! I forgot the best part!

3). I was a smoker. Rebel homeschooler here… When I started college, I decided making friends with Joe Camel would boost my image. Then I realized that I like the stuff. McCarrick detests smokers. Apparently we’re not fit for his consumption. Again, in the summer of 2018, Mom told me that she always knew those cancer sticks would come to good use. “Smoking,” she said at the time, “appears to have saved your ass.”

So is Teddy suffering from dimentia? My strong suspicion is that he’s pulling a Chin Gigante. Is it possible he’s actually lost his marbles? Not likely considering Bobby McElroy got a red hat just a year ago and there’s no way that happens without Teddy’s seal of approval. Folks, I have come to believe that he is the most destructive force in the Church short of Bergoglio since Martin Luther. I believe he’s made literal deals with Satan. So no, I don’t think he’s lost his mind. So what’s going on?

Oh yes, Helen Reddy. Best I can figure, he listened to that old Helen Reddy song Angie Baby one too many times.

“It’s so nice to be insane. No one asks you to explain… Teddy Baby.”

St. Joseph, pray for us! And men, stay strong, stay with your famlies, love your wives, be there with and for your kids. Vermin like Teddy might just get the hint. Thank you, Dad!

Vigano is on to Something (If Only George Neumayr was Still with Us)

I have had a feeling for some time that Bergoglio never actually laicized Theodore McCarrick.

I first got that sense when the late George Neumayr tweeted his own suspicions in December of 2022.

Everything in my gut tells me that the aging sodo-freak evil McCarrick is still a member of the clerical state. I have asked repeatedly over the past few years, “Why is a laicized man enjoying the benefits of Church property and patronage?” I refer to his living arrangements of late in religious order-run places like the Kansas friary. Draw your own conclusions.

And now Archbishop Vigano seems to be echoing the same sentiments.

“It doesn’t even matter to Bergoglio, who proceeded to condemn McCarrick through administrative channels (without ever publishing the document of his dismissal from the clerical state) in order to protect his accomplices…”

Time will tell. I surely do wish someone of George’s tenacity were here to dig into the details and find the truth.

Lord Jesus, have mercy on us all!

Curiouser and Curiouser…

The headline on Canon212 tonight raises many questions. Take a look here. Apparently, Teddy is not only still living on Church property, but he’s doing so at the Redemptorist Mater Seminary in suburban DC – his old stomping grounds. Boy, the diabolical narcissism is strong with this one. They just love putting it right in your face, don’t they?

First, this seminary, if I’m not mistaken, is similar to the RM seminary in the Newark Archdiocese. It is a house of formation (malformation?) for members of the Neocatechumenal Way. Remember them? They were a favorite of Ted when he was serving as ordinary in both the Newark and Washington Sees. They were a favorite because they boosted his numbers and allowed him to claim that he ordained more men than any other bishop in the country each year. He forgot to mention that these foreign born seminarians were all released from service to the ordaining diocese after three years. He also forgot to mention that the whole thing was part of his intricate “pipeline”. Not sure what I mean? Look it up. I’ll wait. Back in the day, Gary and company in Ferndale actually did some decent reporting on this stuff.

Jesus Dies upon the Cross, Front Royal, VA

Second, they seriously stuck him right back in a seminary of all places?! I’ve got a better idea. Let’s take an inveterate drink on a field trip to the local tavern!

Third, I’ve raised the question before but here it is again. When a man is laicized and “returned to the lay state”, how does that man still have access to living arrangements furnished by the institutional Church? Why are they/we housing this bastard at all?

Final note… George Neumayr hinted before his untimely death that it was possible McCarrick has not been laicized after all. Now that George is gone, isn’t it odd that they put McCarrick in residence right in George’s old neck of the woods? It’s almost screaming, “There’s nothing you can do about it…”

All of this and we still haven’t begun to discuss the ritualistic nature of the alleged abuse in the Wisconsin case and the fact that the other man mentioned was almost certainly Joseph Bernardin.

God help us all!

That Uncle Ted Just Never Goes Away, Does He…

I came across an interesting read today via Canon212. It’s a story in the National Catholic Register about Teddy McCarrick’s ongoing legal woes. I learned a few things and I was also left with a few more questions.

The most important thing learned from this article is the fact that it appears the heretofore unnamed victim in the case in Massachusetts is none other than James Grein. Grein, you may recall, is the man who’s testimony before a Vatican inquest ultimately led to McCarrick’s “dismissal from the clerical state”. I put that in quotes because I am more and more convinced it never actually happened. Given what we know about Bergoglio’s penchant for reinstating excommunicated priests and bishops on the sly, my money is that Teddy was never returned to the lay state. And it is interesting to me that it was Grein all the time. This case in Massachusetts was presented from the beginning as a completely distinct abuse case. I still believe Grein. Hell, the Vatican believed him too, right? And I am not here to argue the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. I simply note that this is an interesting development. Grein is a treasure trove of inside information and I think more of what he has alleged over the past four years should be investigated.

The principal question raised in my mind today is one I’ve been pounding at for a while. Why on earth is McCarrick still living at the largesse of the Catholic Church? If he was dismissed, let him find his own lodging. We know he had money at one time. Again I will ask, when I hit my late 80’s or early 90’s can I simply go to a monastery and ask to be let in and taken care of? Will they do it? I’m half tempted to drive to Missouri and ask if I can just stay a few months, see what they say. After all, I am a layman just like (supposedly) he is. It does not add up. It never has.

The last man who brought up the subject – George Neumayr – is dead, they tell us. I don’t want to sound conspiratorial but if the past three years of coronascam have taught us nothing, it is that conspiracy theorists are really just soothsayers in disguise. I never heard of a funeral for the man.* We never got answers that made any sense. Whatever happened, we may never know. But one thing is sure. George was on this story and we need something with that spirit to continue to investigate these things. If I ever decide to knock on the door of that friary in the Show Me State, I’ll be sure to record the whole thing as I channel George and try to get answers. Until then, let us all, as Frank Walker says, “Pray for the Church.”

Queen of heaven, pray for us!

UPDATE: A reader forwarded an obituary for Neumayr. A funeral Mass is being said for him this very day (March 7) in Alexandria, VA.

Francis the Gangsta? More Like Bergoglio the Perv

Here we go again. JM Bergoglio, the Petrine Squatter is reported to have delivered some “off-color” remarks to a group of Spanish seminarians back in December.

Know what this reminds me of? If you guessed my own time in McCarrick’s seminary, then you’d be right and I will award you one gold star.

I saw this on Canon212 earlier (and please hit Frank’s donate button). If what is being reported is true (and please check out the story), then JMB is at best a dirty old man, at worst, well, it doesn’t get much worse than being an antipope and , as Barnhardt calls him, the “probable false prophet forerunner of the antichrist”.

But let’s stick with the dirty old man motif for a second. Is it important that men being trained for priesthood have a basic awareness of the kinds of situations they might face especially in the confessional? Yes. Is it necessary that these men be sexually harassed in the process? You don’t think that’s what this is? In any workplace situation where the CEO comes in to address the most Junior of trainees and starts using that kind of language and indulging himself with sex banter in blunt terms, those trainees could sue. And rightly so. No one wants to be forced to listen to an octogenarian talk about sex at all, let alone in anything other than the most sanitized and clinical terms and only if absolutely necessary.

Let’s not even dig deeper into the question of his supposedly telling these young men to absolve everything even in the absence of a sign of repentance on the part of the sinner. If that’s true then we simply have more evidence that two “churches” exist side by side. Apparently Our Lord’s instruction that some sins could be refused absolution means nothing to Papa Pervo.

But back to my days studying for the holy priesthood. I will never forget the day when the rector of my college seminary delivered a talk to the 25 or so of us young men sitting in the chapel. It was the weekly rector’s conference. I believe his topic was something along the lines of chastity. Yet somehow, about five minutes in, he began describing in vulgar detail the male ejaculation. Only he used other words. He couched it at first by giving the etymology of the French term “petite mort” – the “little death”. I was so confused wondering where he was going with all of this. And then he just blurted it out. “Men, I’m talking about [Latin conjunction for with]-ing”

Whoa.

I was 19. I had never been with a woman. I was not unwise to the workings of human reproduction. I knew the words he was using. I was still as red-faced as a tomato. In front of the Blessed Sacrament, no less! What was he thinking?

Years later I got a copy of the Catechism of Trent and discovered that the Church used to teach that such matters should be broached with great discretion. Not to our rector. Apparently he thought it was “chill” to be “down with the kids”. Again, I never did figure out how his talk related to chastity or what practical information a seminarian could glean from this garbage. I do remember him describing the marriage act in graphic detail including observations about how couples need to “work together to achieve mutual pleasure”. I’ll spare you those details. You’re welcome.

He went on to become a bishop, the Vicar General for McCarrick, and got his own see not long after. Good old Teddy strikes again.

Coming back to Bergoglio, though, I have no doubt that this story is true. For starters, it appears certain that he abandoned his prepared speech. My guess is he noticed actual theological terms on the first page that he knew he couldn’t pronounce.

Regardless, it would behoove him to remember that just because he’s a twisted fetishist doesn’t mean everyone else is. Also, if you’re still wondering how the older stream of Vatican II wickedness still seems to flow through the Church today, look no further. It’s called grooming and they’ve been doing it for years.

Mary, Mother of Priests, pray for us!

Wits and Wagers

Wits

I was asked by a good friend earlier today if I would write a rebuttal to an article linked on Canon212. You will understand why I am not goin to mention either the name of the article or the author or the same. It was a classic screed written by a man who apparently knows very little about Tradition and even less about the Traditional Latin Mass. Frank Walker refers to him as one of the two “ThugBrothers”. I hope Frank trademarks that word. The author waxes idiotic about his premise. “There ought to be one, single liturgy in the Roman Rite,” he opines, or some other such horseshit. “And that liturgy should be the Novus Ordo.” Wow, big shocker from a big brain. He goes on to write a few hundred more words to prove that he has indeed made good use of that thesaurus the other ThugBrother gave him for Christmas.

I remember a conference I attended some years ago in the Denver Archdiocese for Teachers of Theology in Catholic high schools. One of the speakers, a brilliant man, gave a talk wherein he lamented the state of the young mind, how it had been absolutely raped by our degenerate culture. This was in late 2015. He talked of how he would give lectures at local high schools and students would ask him ridiculous questions such as, “Why does the Church hate the gays when they just want to love each other?” and “What’s wrong with trannies and when is the Church going to stop being racist?” He told the assembled group for this conference something that made absolute sense. “I very quickly realized,” he said, “that I will not engage with them anymore. They don’t want answers. They don’t have logic. They cannot argue from reason. Shake the dust from your shoes and move on.” And so to the friend who asked me to rebut the Thug, I will say something similar.

I would love to engage in a battle of wits with this man but I don’t fight unarmed men.

Wagers

George Neumayer tweeted something recently. I’m not on Twitter but others are and they forward me the tweets. I have been a fan of George for many years. I even had the privilege of meeting with him on one or two occasions. As an aside, he is perhaps the most down-to-earth guy you’d ever meet. He is a true reporter. I admire his work. George tweeted to the effect that the Vatican might not be able to produce the laicization documents for my old ordinary/nemesis Teddy McCarrick because they might not exist. I’d be willing to wager that George is right. I think I shall explore this question further… Stay tuned.

Friday Night Roundup – Now With 30% More Gluten!

Rita, Rita, Rita…

She’s definitely after me, folks. Today I was on a Zoom call with a contractor who casually mentioned he had rescheduled our meeting because of “St. Rita”. Puzzled, I asked what he meant. Turns out his kids go to St. Rita’s School and he got stuck in carpool hell. She’s a clever one, that Rita. Look, I don’t have to have a house drop on me to know she’s up to something. I’m hoping it’s something big. Tomorrow is day 9 for my novena. If you read this post and you think about it, consider joining in one prayer to this saint for my intentions. Thank you.

You Don’t Say

I had a conversation with a young man I had just met at my sister’s house a few nights ago. I may have had a gin in my hand. The lad had recently graduated from college, a fairly good one at that, solid faith, etc. At the right moment I pounced on him with the antipapacy thesis. “But you can’t say Francis is an antipope!” he said breathlessly. “I just did,” said I. “Now fetch me another drink and we’ll continue your education.” A few moments later the Legionaries of Christ came up. “You mean that money laundering rape cult?” I asked. Again my young friend jumped in, “You can’t call them that!!” Again I replied, “I just did. Open your ears, pal, you’re starting to sound like a broken record.”

Kids today…

St. Joseph the Protector of the Holy Family, stained glass, St. Joan of Arc Catholic Church, Hershey, PA

Old Queers and How We Should Call them

Mr. Walker had a wonderful headline up this week. Beneath a picture of a clearly decrepit Ted McCarrick were the words “Uncle Ted Not Looking Well”.

Look, Teddy has made many deals with Satan. I’m sure we’ll have his nonsense to deal with for a while. Either way he’s an old faggot and there’s nothing worse than an old faggot, as a priest once told me. And to those who still question why I call him and his ilk by this moniker? It’s simple. Noel Coward was gay. These guys? Soul-stealing sodomite faggots to the core.

Say your prayers.

Mother of Good Counsel, pray for us!